Brown v. Correct Care Solution et al
| Keith S. Brown |
| Correct Care Solution, Mental Health Manager Corporation, Department of Correctional, James Frommer, Quentin Dolphin, Conrade Agre, William Dreibelbis, Jay Whitesel and Kevin Kauffman |
| 3:2016cv02053 |
| October 11, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Huntingdon |
| DB |
| William J. Nealon |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER TERMINATING CASE: 1. Defendants motion to revoke Plaintiffs in forma pauperisstatus (Doc. 42) is GRANTED.2. The portion of this Courts October 21, 2016 Order,granting Plaintiffs application for leave to proceed informa pauperis is VACATED.3. Pl aintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) inthe above-captioned action is DENIED in accordance with28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the action is dismissed for failureto pay the full filing fee without prejudice to Plaintiff toreopen the act ion by submitting the full filing fee withinsixty (60) days.4. All outstanding motions are to be DISMISSED; 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the abovecaptionedcase.6. Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and notin good faith. See 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3).WITHOUT PREJUDICE.Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 2/13/17. (ep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
