Layton v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Valentina Vernarda Layton
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2016cv02437
Filed: December 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Dauphin
Presiding Judge: Edwin M. Kosik
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT be & is hereby ENTERED in favor of deft Commissioner & against pltf Layton as follows: The decision of the Commissioner denying the app for disability insurance benefits & supp'l security income of Layton is AFFIRMED in acc w/ ct's order 13 of 2/8/18. (See order for complete details.)Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 2/8/18. (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Layton v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Valentina Vernarda Layton
Represented By: Beth Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?