McDonald v. Lowe et al
||Julian Dain McDonald
||Craig A. Lowe, Jeh Charles Johnson, Thomas R. Decker, Thomas S. Winkowaski, Jacqueline Osterlind and Loretta E. Lynch
||January 9, 2017
||US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
||Robert D. Mariani
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 23, 2017
ORDER 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is GRANTED. 2. The Immigration Judge shall afford Petitioner an individualized bond hearing within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. 3. At the bond hearing, the Immigration Judge mu st make an individualized inquiry into whether detention is still necessary to fulfill the purposes of ensuring that the Petitioner attends removal proceedings and that his release will not pose a danger to the community. Chavez-Alvarez v. Warden Yor k Cnty. Prison, 783 F.3d 469, 475 (3d Cir. 2015). At this hearing, the Government bears the burden of presenting evidence and proving that continued detention is necessary to fulfill the purposes of the detention statute. Diop v.ICE/Homeland Sec., 65 6 F.3d 221, 233 (3d Cir. 2011). 4. Within ten (10) days of the bond hearing, Respondent shall file a notification with the Court that Petitioner has received an appropriate individualized bond determination. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/23/17. (jfg)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?