Wingo v. Trover Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Denise Wingo
Defendant: Trover Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2017cv00846
Filed: May 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/1/17. (dw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wingo v. Trover Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Wingo
Represented By: James C. Haggerty
Represented By: Charles Kannebecker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trover Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel T. Brier
Represented By: Halley W Josephs
Represented By: Shawn J Rabin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?