Benussi v. Luzerne County et al
| Robert Benussi |
| Luzerne County, Robert Lawton, James Larson, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Geisinger Clinic, Gunnar Kosik, John Buckley, Bill Meehan, Pam Langdon, John/Jane Doe Medical Defendants I-X and John/Jane Doe Corrections Defendants I-X |
| 3:2017cv01668 |
| September 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). (A) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Correct Care Solutions, Renato Diaz, Elizabeth Joyce, and Michael Tengowski 27 is GRANTED. (1) The Amended Complaint 18 is DISMISSED witho ut prejudice as to Defendants Correct Care Solutions, Renato Diaz, Elizabeth Joyce, Michael Tengowski, and John/Jane Doe Medical Defendants.(B) The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Luzerne County, Robert Lawton,and James Larson 21 is GRANTED i n part and DENIED in part. (1) Counts Three and Four of the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendants Luzerne County, Robert Lawton, James Larson, and John/Jane Doe Correctional Defendants. (2) The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/28/18. (dw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
