UM Technologies, LLC v. HILTS Global (Cayman) Limited et al
UM Technologies, LLC |
HILTS Global (Cayman) Limited, HILTS Global (US), LLC, HILTS Global (UK) and Mark Brooke |
3:2017cv01998 |
November 1, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Lackawanna |
Robert D. Mariani |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING 24 and 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 20 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 22 Motion for Damages. JUDGMENT is entered IN FAVOR OF Plaintiff, UM Technolgies, LLC, and AGAINST Defendants HILTS Global (Cayman) Limited, HILTS Global (UK), HILTS Global (US), LLC, and Mark Brooke in the amount of $238,723.07. Clerk of COurt DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/29/19. (jam) |
Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. Judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff UM Technologies, LLC and against Defendants HILTS Global (US), HILTS Global (Cayman) Limited, and HILTS Global (UK). Within 21 days Plaintiff shall file a supplemental motion pursuant to FRCP 55 seeking to liquidate its damages. The case is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/26/19. (jam) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.