Haywood v. Martynowicz et al
| David Hassan Ali Haywood |
| Martynowicz, Garry Haidle, Almond, Joseph McCoy, Mario Orlando and James C. Rogers |
| 3:2018cv00610 |
| March 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Monroe |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 64 and 66 Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted; Plaintiff's second amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice; Plaintiff shall within 30 days, file an amended complaint. (see order for further/complete details) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 2/19/2020. (lg)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Carlson's 38 Amended Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety; all claims against the Monroe County Correctional Facility are dismissed with pre judice; Plaintiff's request for a specific amount of unliquidated damages is stricken; 31 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied without prejudice; 37 Report and Recommendation is rejected as moot; this case is remanded back to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 1/31/19. (lg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
