Vitez et al v. Santander Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Maureen Vitez, DMS Enterprises, Inc. and David Vitez
Defendant: Santander Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 3:2018cv01661
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Malachy E Mannion
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). The defendants motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint, (Doc. 8), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/10/18. (bs)
October 10, 2018 Filing 15 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint filed by Santander Bank, N.A. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/10/18. (bs)
October 9, 2018 Filing 14 REPLY BRIEF re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint filed by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Unpublished Opinion(s) Ex. A- Gesiorski v. Branch Banking and Trust, #2 Unpublished Opinion(s) Ex. B- Squires Golf Club v. Bank of America, #3 Unpublished Opinion(s) Ex. C- Windon Country Homes v. Hudson United Bank, #4 Certification of Service)(Hoensch, Fred)
October 5, 2018 Filing 13 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint filed by DMS Enterprises, Inc., David Vitez, Maureen Vitez.(Carpenito, Stephen)
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by pltf. 11/15/18, by deft. 11/30/2018. Fact Discovery due by 3/15/2019. Plaintiff Expert Report is due by 4/15/2019. Defendant Expert Report is due by 4/30/2019. Supplemental due by 5/15/2019. Expert Discovery Deadline is due by 6/3/2019. Joinder of Parties due by pltf. 11/15/18, by deft. 11/30/2018. Dispositive Motions due by 7/1/2019. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/5/18. (bs)
September 27, 2018 Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Hoensch, Fred)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER dismissing #3 w/o prej. Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 9/20/18 (bs)
September 20, 2018 Filing 9 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint filed by Santander Bank, N.A..(Hoensch, Fred)
September 20, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Nonconcurrence, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(Hoensch, Fred)
September 19, 2018 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs, filed by David Vitez, Maureen Vitez, DMS Enterprises, Inc..(Carpenito, Stephen)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 10/5/2018 10:30 AM before Honorable Malachy E Mannion.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 8/23/18. (bs)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 8/23/18. (bs)
August 22, 2018 Filing 4 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Santander Bank, N.A..(Hoensch, Fred)
August 22, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Nonconcurrence, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(Hoensch, Fred)
August 22, 2018 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Santander Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Santander Holdings USA, Inc. for Santander Bank, N.A.. (Hoensch, Fred)
August 22, 2018 SPECIAL ADMISSION FORM SENT to Attorney Carpenito. (ch1)
August 21, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Santander Bank, N.A. from Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, case number S-375-2018. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 4521487), filed by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exh A, #2 Exh B, #3 Exh C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ep)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vitez et al v. Santander Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santander Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Marissa Edwards
Represented By: Fred W Hoensch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maureen Vitez
Represented By: Stephen T. Carpenito
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DMS Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen T. Carpenito
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Vitez
Represented By: Stephen T. Carpenito
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?