Eaton v. Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc.
Ruth Eaton |
Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc. doing business as Commonwealth Health Systems doing business as Wilkes-Barre General Hospital, LLC doing business as Wilkes-Barre General Hospital |
3:2020cv01596 |
September 3, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Christopher C Conner |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 11 REPLY BRIEF re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction with certificate of service and certification of word count filed by Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc..(Steinberg, Sidney) |
![]() |
Filing 9 Letter from Daniel Thornton requesting extension to file Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss. (Thornton, Daniel) |
Filing 8 EXHIBIT - Unpublished Opinion by Ruth Eaton re #7 Brief in Opposition. (Pollick, Cynthia) |
Filing 7 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction filed by Ruth Eaton.(Pollick, Cynthia) |
Filing 6 BRIEF IN SUPPORT Defendant, Wilkes-Barre Hospital Company, LLC's re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction filed by Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-Agreement between Wilkes-Barre Hospital and WVNA/PASNAP, #2 Exhibit(s) B-Carpenter v, Wawa)(Steinberg, Sidney) |
Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction by Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Concurrence)(Steinberg, Sidney) |
![]() |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc.. (Steinberg, Sidney) |
Filing 2 EXHIBITS by Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) B)(ao) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc. from Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, case number 2020-06725. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number APAMDC-5237252), filed by Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Eaton v. Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ruth Eaton | |
Represented By: | Cynthia L. Pollick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commonwealth Health Systems, Inc. doing business as Commonwealth Health Systems doing business as Wilkes-Barre General Hospital, LLC doing business as Wilkes-Barre General Hospital | |
Represented By: | Sidney R. Steinberg |
Represented By: | Daniel F. Thornton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.