DelValles-Vincente v. Capozza et al
| Ruben DelValles-Vincente |
| Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Mark Capozza |
| 3:2021cv00335 |
| February 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| DB |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER with Notice of Limitations on Filing of Future Petitions Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/14/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Election)(bs) |
| Receipt of payment from RUBEN DELVALLES-VINCENTE in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 3/11/2021. Receipt number 333075402 processed by gangeli. (tp) |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 02/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Ruben DelValles-Vincente.(lp) Modified on 2/24/2021 (lp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
