Shumkova v. Kerchentsev et al
| Tatiana Shumkova |
| Vladimir Kerchentsev and Alexander Kerchentsev |
| 3:2021cv01015 |
| June 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: : Case transferred from Pennsylvania Middle has been opened in Eastern District of Pennsylvania as case 2:21-cv-02621, filed 06/09/2021. (jw) |
Filing 4
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) that this case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 9, 2021. (kjn)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re #1 Complaint filed by Tatiana Shumkova. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 9, 2021. (kjn)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tatiana Shumkova.(ma) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Tatiana Shumkova. Jury trial demand. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
