LUCAS v. FRANCISCO et al
Eddie Curtis Lucas, Jr. |
Eric Pipenbrink and Mejia Francisco |
3:2024cv01172 |
July 16, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
William I Arbuckle |
Contract: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eddie Curtis Lucas, Jr. (caw) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Eddie Curtis Lucas, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope) (Originally filed in WDPA as an attachment to Doc #1 on July 1, 2024.) (jw) |
Filing 4 Case transferred electronically in from District of Pennsylvania Western; Case Number 2:24-cv-00935 containing electronic documents. |
Filing 3 Remark: On this date, a copy of #2 Memorandum Order was mailed to Mr. Lucas. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 7/16/2024.] |
![]() |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by EDDIE CURTIS LUCAS. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Envelope) (njd) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 7/16/2024.] Modified on 7/16/2024 (caw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.