UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Crissman et al
||UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
||Ellery A. Crissman, II, Penny L. Crissman, DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, Ticor Title Insurance Company, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and Best Line Leasing, Inc.
||September 30, 2009
||US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
||A. Richard Caputo
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||26:7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 22, 2011
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 94 Motion for Reconsideration. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Order dated October 14, 2011 is revised. See Order for specific details. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 11/22/11 (jam, )
|November 4, 2011
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 85 Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 11/4/11 (jam, )
|September 28, 2011
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1) The United Statess unopposed Motion for Partial Summary Judgement against Defendant Penny Crissman (Doc. 52) is GRANTED without a merits analysis. 2) The United Statess Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. 72) is GRANTED in that the United States has valid and subsisting tax liens that attached to the Real Property located at 110 Piccadilly Road, Port Matilda, Centre County, Pennsylvania ( the Property); that those tax liens be and are foreclosed ; that the United States may sell the Real Property in accordance with a separate Order to be entered by the Court. 3) The United States is directed to submit such an appropriate order for sale of the Property to the Court within twenty-one (21) day s. 4) The United Statess Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. 72) is GRANTED in respect to its assertion of priority against Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. as a general matter of law. 5) The United Statess Motion for Summa ry Judgement (Doc. 72) is DENIED in respect to its assertion that the Stipulation between the parties does not control the issue of lien priority in this specific instance. 6) The Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. (Doc. 69) is DENIED. 7) The Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.s Counterclaim for Declaratory Relief (Doc. 21) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/27/11 (jam, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?