HOFFMAN et al v. CHAMPION POWER EQUIPMENT, INC.
||JAMES HOFFMAN and CHERYL HOFFMAN
||CHAMPION POWER EQUIPMENT, INC.
||September 18, 2015
||US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
||Matthew W. Brann
|Nature of Suit:
||Property Damage Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 21, 2017
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; because this decision, per FRCP 54(b) adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties, formal entry of jgmt is deferred pending final resolution; case mgt deadlines remain in full force and effect. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/21/17. (lg)
|June 12, 2017
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 57 MOTION to Compel is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: The Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories, Nos. 22 and 23, as well as Plaintiffs' Second Set of Interroga tories, Nos. 5-8, 12. The Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Interrogatories, Nos. 2 & 9, as described more completely above. The discovery deadline is reset to 7/31/2017. All other case management deadlines shall remain unchanged. Counsel for Defendant shall serve the required supplemental responses on counsel for Plaintiffs no later than 7/3/2017. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/12/2017. (See Order for further details.) (jn)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?