Koch v. Federal Public Defenders Office, Tacoma
Plaintiff: Michael William Koch
Defendant: Federal Public Defenders Office, Tacoma
Case Number: 4:2016cv01553
Filed: July 27, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 6 Report and Recommendations; Complaint is dismissed; denying as moot 11 Motion to Stay; clerk directred to close the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 11/28/16. (case closed)(lg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Koch v. Federal Public Defenders Office, Tacoma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael William Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Public Defenders Office, Tacoma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?