McGee v. Conyngham Township et al
John McGee |
Conyngham Township, Conyngham Township Board of Supervisors, Conyngham Township Authority, Linda Tarlecki, Todd Croker and Joseph Shriner |
4:2017cv01639 |
September 12, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Williamsport Office |
Columbia |
Matthew W. Brann |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 36 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Counts I, II, and III of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, Doc. 21, are DISMISSED WITH PREJ UDICE in their entirety. Count IV of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, Doc. 21, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants ConynghamTownship and Conyngham Township Authority only. A telephonic status conference will be scheduled by separate Order. Caption will amend. (See Order for further/complete details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/10/2020. (jr) |
Filing 20 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 9 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an Amended Complaint to correct the deficiencies outlined in my Memorandum Opinion no later than twenty-one(21) days from the date of this Order. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/1/2018. (jr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.