Moon v. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Tamica Moon
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 4:2018cv00323
Filed: February 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Dauphin
Presiding Judge: Matthew W. Brann
Referring Judge: Joseph F. Saporito
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 13 Report and Recommendation is adopted in full; decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff; Clerk directed to close the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 1/10/19. (lg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moon v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamica Moon
Represented By: Katherine L. Niven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?