Lopez-Velasquez v. Warden
Petitioner: Rodrigo Ruben Lopez-Velasquez
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 4:2019cv01766
Filed: October 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CK
Referring Judge: Matthew W Brann
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (aaa)
October 9, 2019 Filing 2 Petition for Supervised Release by Rodrigo Ruben Lopez-Velasquez. (aaa)
October 9, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Rodrigo Ruben Lopez-Velasquez.(aaa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez-Velasquez v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodrigo Ruben Lopez-Velasquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?