Lose v. Saul
Plaintiff: Roy A. Lose
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 4:2021cv00662
Filed: April 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: William I Arbuckle
Referring Judge: Christopher C Conner
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2021 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint for 60 days, up to and including August 13, 2021 by Andrew Saul. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jebby Rasputnis April 29, 2021, #2 Certificate of Concurrence, #3 Proposed Order)(Black, Bryan)
April 29, 2021 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT re #3 Summons Issued as to USA,, #1 Complaint OF SERVICE filed by Roy A. Lose of Affiant Attorney Suzette V. Sims. (Sims, Suzette)
April 26, 2021 VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Christopher C. Conner and referred to Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle as one or more parties have not consented to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (jkc)
April 19, 2021 Filing 6 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to All Parties YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 5/19/2021. (caw)
April 19, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Craig Black on behalf of Andrew Saul. (Black, Bryan)
April 13, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Roy A. Lose re #3 Summons Issued as to USA,, #1 Complaint Proof of Service (Sims, Suzette)
April 12, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). After you make service, you are further directed to file a Return of Service using the event Summons Returned Executed as to USA under the category Service of Process, in ECF. (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (nr)
April 12, 2021 Filing 2 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals.(nr)
April 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number 5541847), filed by Roy A. Lose. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(nr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lose v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Bryan Craig Black
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy A. Lose
Represented By: Suzette V. Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?