Gross v. Stine et al
Malvin Ryan Gross |
Danielle Marie Stine, Christina Louise Dinges and Administrative Court of the 29th Judical Lycoming County PA Administration and it Agents |
4:2021cv00699 |
April 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Susan E Schwab |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting pltf's application to proceed IFP #2 , deeming complaint filed & noting undersigned magistrate judge shall conduct a preliminary review of the complaint. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 5/17/21. (ki) |
Filing 5 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Service Form)(nr) |
Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Prisoner Instructions for Filing a Complaint, #2 Excerpts of Local and Federal Rules) (nr) |
Filing 3 AO 398 and AO 399 Waiver of Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (nr) |
Filing 2 MOTION/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Malvin Ryan Gross.(nr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Administrative Court of the 29th Judical Lycoming County PA Administration and it Agents, Christina Louise Dinges, Danielle Marie Stine lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Malvin Ryan Gross. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(nr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.