McKay v. Harry et al
Plaintiff: Mark McKay
Defendant: Superintendent Harry and John Wetzel
Case Number: 4:2021cv01053
Filed: June 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EBC
Referring Judge: Matthew W Brann
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #7 Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation is adopted; the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice; Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 21 days. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 8/11/2021. (lg)
August 9, 2021 Receipt of payment from MARK MCKAY in the amount of $26.34 for PLRA CIVIL FILING FEE. Transaction posted on 8/6/2021. Receipt number 333077492 processed by smurphy. (jjs)
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Mark McKay - IT IS RECOMMENDED that the plaintiffs complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A without prejudice to the filing of an amended complaint which endeavors to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, provided the plaintiff acts promptly and files a proposed amended complaint within 21 days of the entry of any dismissal order. Objections to R&R due by 7/6/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 22, 2021. (kjn)
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Superintendent/Warden of the institution wherein Plaintiff is presently confined. For screening purposes only the Complaint is DEEMED filed. Service is deferred pending completion of legally-mandated screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 22, 2021. (kjn)
June 15, 2021 Filing 5 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules) (lp)
June 15, 2021 Filing 4 AO 398 and AO 399 Waiver of Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (lp)
June 15, 2021 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Mark McKay. (lp)
June 15, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark McKay.(lp)
June 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Superintendent Harry, John Wetzel lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Mark McKay.(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKay v. Harry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superintendent Harry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Wetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark McKay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?