Kearney v. Smith et al
| Richard Muliek Kearney |
| Barry Smith and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office |
| 4:2021cv01636 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| MP |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REQUEST by Richard Muliek Kearney to note postal address. (lg) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF ELECTION (choosing to have Court rule on petition as filed) by Richard Muliek Kearney. (lg) |
| SHOW CAUSE ORDER, petition, attachments, 10/18/2021 order served on PA Attorney General, and Superintendent Barry Smith. (nr) |
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #1 Petition is deemed filed; Clerk directed to serve the petition, attachments, and this order on the PA Attorney General, and Superintendent Barry Smith. Show Cause Response due by 11/10/2021. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 10/18/2021. (nr)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ELECTION (choose to have Court rule on petition as filed) by Richard Muliek Kearney. (lg) |
| Filing 9 Application to Proceed IFP filed by Richard Kearney. (lg) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of payment by Richard Muliek Kearney. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(lg) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Richard Muliek Kearney re payment of filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits - Cash Slips)(lg) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner is granted leave to withdraw the current 2254 petition without prejudice to filing another; Petitioner is granted 45 days to notify the Court of his decision. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 9/30/2021. (lg)
|
| Receipt of payment from RICHARD KEARNEY KN9695 in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 9/29/2021. Receipt number 333078180 processed by epetrosk. (jjs) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee received: $ 5, receipt number 333078183. Petition is now deemed FILED. (lg) |
| Filing 4 Application to proceed ifp filed by Richard Kearney. (lg) |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 09/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Richard Muliek Kearney. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-Writ of Habeas Corpus Attachments imn Support - Outlined each paragraph as it relates to claims, #2 Attachment B- Opinion and Order of Court from Court of Common Pleas of Fulton County Criminal Action by Judge Angela R. Krom dated January 27, 2020, #3 Attachment D (No Attachment C) - Appeal from PCRA Order of January 28, 2020 In Court of Common Pleas of Fulton County RE: CP-29-CR-0000227-2011, #4 Attachment E-Petitioner's Notice of Appeal dated February 24, 2020, #5 Exhibit F-Order denying request for Reargument is denied Per Curiam, #6 PCRA NT 05/07/2019 - Transcripts of Proceeding of PCRA Hearing, #7 PCRA NT 01/07/2020 - Transcript of Evidentiary Hearing on Petitioner's PCRA Petition, #8 PCRA Oral Argument NT - dated January 7, 2020 Transcript)(lp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
