Brown v. Warden of Minnesota Correctional Facility - Faribault et al
| Zackary Andrew Brown |
| Warden of Minnesota Correctional Facility - Faribault, Keith Ellison and Minnesota Attorney General's Office |
| 4:2022cv00608 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| MP |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Clerk is directed to TRANSFER case to United States District Court for the District of Minnesota; A certificate of appealability shall not issue; the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 4/28/2022. (nr)
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case transferred from Pennsylvania Middle has been opened in U.S. District of Minnesota as case 0:22-cv-01122, filed 04/29/2022. (ibr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Petition not signed by petitioner-signed by "petitioner's fiance") lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Zackary Andrew Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Proof of Service, #3 Receipt (check returned as payee was incorrect))(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
