GEER v. NISH
Case Number: 1:2006cv00038
Filed: February 17, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
Presiding Judge: Susan Paradise Baxter
Presiding Judge: Sean J. McLaughlin
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM ORDER: AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2011; IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be, and hereby is DENIED. Inasmuch as jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether the instant petition is untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) and/or whether the Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue.The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter dated December 3, 2010 33 is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 1/6/2011. (kas)
December 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by BENJAMIN RICHARD GEER, JR. be denied and that a certificate of appealability be denied. Objections to R&R due by 12/20/2010. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 12/3/10. (lrw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GEER v. NISH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?