BIDDLE v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: AMY L. BIDDLE
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 1:2008cv00142
Filed: May 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Erie Office
County: Crawford
Presiding Judge: Maurice B. Cohill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER that the 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by AMY L. BIDDLE is DENIED and the 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL J. ASTRUE is GRANTED. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 7/22/2009. (sjs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BIDDLE v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMY L. BIDDLE
Represented By: James C. Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?