WALNEY v. SWEPI LP et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 20, 2018
ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 140 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by THOMAS J. WALNEY, RODNEY A. BEDOW, SR. and DENYING 156 MOTION for Summary Judgment on the Class Claims filed by SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC, and SWEPI LP, as set forth more fully in the accompanying memorandum opinion. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 04/20/2018. (kas)
|January 23, 2017
ORDER GRANTING 117 plaintiffs' Second Motion to Amend Class Definition; GRANTING 114 the parties' Joint Motion (Contested) for Approval of Plan of Class Action Notice, and directing that the parties incorporate modifications to the class notice forms and class notice order as set forth in the accompanying Opinion; DENYING AS MOOT 127 plaintiffs' Motion to Expedite Entry of Orders. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 01/23/2017. (kas)
|May 13, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 93 MOTION to Amend/Correct 90 Order on Motion to Certify Class,, >Motion to Amend Class Definition filed by THOMAS J. WALNEY, RODNEY A. BEDOW, SR. As set forth more fully within, Plaintiff's Motion 93 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 5/13/2106. (cal)
|September 14, 2015
OPINION re 62 MOTION to Certify Class filed by THOMAS J. WALNEY, RODNEY A. BEDOW, SR. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification will be granted with respect to the breach of contract claims at Counts I and I(A) of the second amended complaint. The motion will be denied in all other respects. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/14/2015. (bgm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?