BROWN v. FOX et al
| LAMAR BROWN |
| FOX, MORENDO, JOHN DOE, OBRIEN, DUNMIRE, STREICHART and JOHN DOE 2 |
| 1:2014cv00109 |
| April 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Erie |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration 118 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for status conference 125 is GRANTED. A status conference will be set by separate Order of this Court. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 1/7/19. (lrw)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 103 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by DUNMIRE, FOX, STREICHART, OBRIEN, MORENDO. Order to follow. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 5/12/17. (lrw)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER that Defendants motion to dismiss 8 is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for default judgment 14 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proposed amended complaint 12 is deeme d filed. In response to the amended complaint, Defendants may file an answer or motion to dismiss before April 3, 2015. Defendants should take care to address all the allegations of the amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 3/17/2015. (lrw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
