ANGLE v. OVERMYER et al
| ANGLE and BRYAN ANGLE, II |
| SHEZLEY, COWEN, UNIT MANAGER BLICKA, SANTELL, GUSTUFSON, OBER LANDER, GILL and SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER |
| 1:2019cv00054 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Richard A Lanzillo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 OBJECTIONS to #2 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by BRYAN ANGLE, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
Filing 2
ORDER dismissing #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case administratively closed, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee. Plaintiff may reopen the case by (i) tendering to the "Clerk, U.S. District Court," a statutory filing fee in the amount of $350.00, plus an administrative filing fee in the amount of $50.00, for a total of $400.00 or (ii) submitting another motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required affidavit and a certified copy of the inmate account statement for the six (6) months preceding the filing of the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 3/5/2019. (dm)
|
| NO USM-285's received. (sdp) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ANGLE. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Envelope) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
