COTTERMAN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| DIANE L. COTTERMAN and MICHAEL R. HANCOCK |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2020cv00189 |
| July 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by DIANE L. COTTERMAN, MICHAEL R. HANCOCK. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA served on 8/6/2020, answer due 10/5/2020. (Attachments: #1 Receipt) (Varsek, Robert) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by DIANE L. COTTERMAN, MICHAEL R. HANCOCK. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA served on 7/16/2020, answer due 8/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Receipt) (Varsek, Robert) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by DIANE L. COTTERMAN, MICHAEL R. HANCOCK. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA served on 7/15/2020, answer due 8/5/2020. (Attachments: #1 Receipt) (Varsek, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (jd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-574805), filed by DIANE L. COTTERMAN, MICHAEL R. HANCOCK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
