TATE v. BIANCHI
AMOS TATE |
JASON BIANCHI, SCOTT and PHIL |
1:2020cv00311 |
October 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Susan Paradise Baxter |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time by AMOS TATE. (jjg) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JASON BIANCHI, PHIL, SCOTT, filed by AMOS TATE. (jjg) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against JASON BIANCHI, filed by AMOS TATE. (jjg) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ORDER: AND NOW, this 10th day of December 2020; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff file an Amended Complaint in accordance with the instructions within this Memorandum Order before December 23, 2020. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 12/10/2020. (esa) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by AMOS TATE. (jv) |
Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by AMOS TATE. (jjg) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AMOS TATE. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 ***Removed from Public View*** Consent to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge / District Judge Option, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit) (jjg) Modified on 10/29/2020 (jjg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.