DALE v. SAFOCO, INC.
| CLAYTON DALE |
| SAFOCO, INC. |
| 1:2021cv00238 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 BRIEF in Support re #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Transfer Case filed by SAFOCO, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Exhibit A-5, #7 Exhibit A-6, #8 Exhibit A-7, #9 Exhibit A-8, #10 Exhibit B) (Horowitz, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION to Transfer Case by SAFOCO, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Horowitz, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 Proposed Order re #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by SAFOCO, INC.. (Anderson, David) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for attorney David K. Anderson to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6768283) by SAFOCO, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of David K. Anderson in support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice) (Anderson, David) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. SAFOCO, INC. answer due 10/22/2021. Signed by Judge Susan Paradise Baxter on 9/27/2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (esa)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by CLAYTON DALE by SAFOCO, INC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Horowitz, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew J. Horowitz on behalf of SAFOCO, INC. (Horowitz, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G) (cww) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by CLAYTON DALE. SAFOCO, INC. served on 9/3/2021, answer due 9/24/2021. (Linn, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to SAFOCO, INC. (cww) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAFOCO, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6675283), filed by CLAYTON DALE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G) (cww) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DALE v. SAFOCO, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CLAYTON DALE | |
| Represented By: | Kyle J. Semroc |
| Represented By: | Robert M. Linn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SAFOCO, INC. | |
| Represented By: | David K. Anderson |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Horowitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
