SWITZER v. FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP
Plaintiff: KERRY LEE SWITZER, JR.
Defendant: FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP and CORTECH
Case Number: 1:2022cv00201
Filed: June 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Richard A Lanzillo
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER The United States Marshal is directed to mail a copy of the complaint, notice of lawsuit, request for waiver of service of summons, waiver, and this order to defendant as directed by plaintiff. Costs shall be advanced by the government. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 8/25/2022. (dlh)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the Court with proper instructions for service upon each of the named Defendants listed in the Complaint including a U.S. Marshal Form 285 for each defendant, a completed notice and waiver of summons for each defendant on or before September 14, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 8/15/2022. (dlh)
August 9, 2022 Filing 6 Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number 14668005251. (gmw) Modified on 8/10/2022 (keh).
August 4, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Permanent Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by KERRY LEE SWITZER, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Envelope) (keh)
August 1, 2022 Filing 4 Remark: Check in the amount of $400 returned to Plaintiff for incorrect filing fee amount. (elt)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AMENDED ORDER re #2 Order Administratively Closing case. Statutory filing fee is $350.00, plus a $52.00 administrative fee, for a total of $402.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 7/26/2022. (dlh)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER This action may not proceed unless the Plaintiff either, tenders to the "Clerk, U.S. District Court" the statutory filing fee in the amount of $400 or files a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is instructed to mark this case administratively closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo on 7/22/2022. (dlh)
June 29, 2022 Filing 1 Remark: Complaint lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (keh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SWITZER v. FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KERRY LEE SWITZER, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANKLIN INVESTMENT CORP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORTECH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?