AZAFFARESE-DIPPOLD, et al. v. MULHOLLAN
Plaintiff: SHARON ZAFFARESE-DIPPOLD and CARL CODDINGTON
Defendant: MELISSA MULHOLLAN
Case Number: 1:2022cv00329
Filed: October 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Cathy Bissoon
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: All counsel of record in this case must read the attached article on mediation prior to the initial Case Management Conference and share the same with their client(s). The attached article is being disseminated with permission of the author and The Pennsylvania Lawyer. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Mediation Article) (kly)
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER, Video Initial Case Management Conference set before Judge Cathy Bissoon, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/16/2022. (kly)
December 15, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by MELISSA MULHOLLAN. (Rumbaugh, Shane)
November 15, 2022 Filing 7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by MELISSA MULHOLLAN Answer due from MELISSA MULHOLLAN on 12/15/2022. (Rumbaugh, Shane)
November 10, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by SHARON ZAFFARESE-DIPPOLD, CARL CODDINGTON. MELISSA MULHOLLAN served on 11/4/2022, answer due 11/25/2022. (Cox, Alexander)
November 10, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Shane Rumbaugh on behalf of MELISSA MULHOLLAN. (Rumbaugh, Shane)
October 27, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Aurora L. Hardin on behalf of CARL CODDINGTON, SHARON ZAFFARESE-DIPPOLD. (Hardin, Aurora)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 10/27/2022. (kly)
October 27, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MELISSA MULHOLLAN (jd)
October 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MELISSA MULHOLLAN (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7356468), filed by SHARON ZAFFARESE-DIPPOLD, CARL CODDINGTON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AZAFFARESE-DIPPOLD, et al. v. MULHOLLAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHARON ZAFFARESE-DIPPOLD
Represented By: Alexander K. Cox
Represented By: Aurora L. Hardin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CARL CODDINGTON
Represented By: Alexander K. Cox
Represented By: Aurora L. Hardin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MELISSA MULHOLLAN
Represented By: Shane Rumbaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?