BAILEY v. BLAINE, et al

BAILEY v. BLAINE, et al

Case Number:	2:2001cv00005
Filed:	March 16, 2020
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 6, 2022	Filing 80 MEMORANDUM ORDER - Motion for Relief from Judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(1) 77 is DENIED to the extent Petitioner is challenging this Courts previous resolution of his petition as time-barred; the motion is also DI SMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as an unauthorized second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus insofar as it challenges his underlying conviction and not the manner in which his habeas petition was procured; the Report and Recommendation dated April 18, 2022 78 is adopted as the Opinion of the Court as supplemented herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 5/6/2022. (jmc)
March 16, 2020	Filing 65 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 58 Motion for Relief of Judgment and adopting Report and Recommendations re 63 Report and Recommendations. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rulesof Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided byRule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/16/2020. (kly)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 6, 2022

Filing 80 MEMORANDUM ORDER - Motion for Relief from Judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(1) 77 is DENIED to the extent Petitioner is challenging this Courts previous resolution of his petition as time-barred; the motion is also DI SMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as an unauthorized second or successive petition for writ of habeas corpus insofar as it challenges his underlying conviction and not the manner in which his habeas petition was procured; the Report and Recommendation dated April 18, 2022 78 is adopted as the Opinion of the Court as supplemented herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 5/6/2022. (jmc)

March 16, 2020

Filing 65 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 58 Motion for Relief of Judgment and adopting Report and Recommendations re 63 Report and Recommendations. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rulesof Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided byRule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/16/2020. (kly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BAILEY v. BLAINE, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?