HINTON v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Plaintiff: JOLANDO HINTON
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Case Number: 2:2008cv00685
Filed: May 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Lancaster
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 59 Motion for Attorney Fees without prejudice; If warranted by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit's resolution of the pending appeal, plaintiff may file a renewed motion for attorney's fees no later than fourteen (14) days after the mandate is issued; If such a motion is filed, the court will thereafter issue a briefing schedule. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 5/20/11. (map)
March 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying 64 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the alternative, MOTION for New Trial. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 3/25/11. (map)
February 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER of Jury Selection Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 2/8/11. (map)
October 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER denying without prejudice 37 Motions in Limine to Exclude Evidence at Trial. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 10/5/10. (map)
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER setting Pretrial Conference for 1/28/2011 at 1:30 PM and Jury Selection and Trial for 2/7/2011 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 3A. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/21/10. (map)
September 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER denying 51 Motion for Partial Reconsideration of the Opinion and Order of 8/30/2010. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/7/10. (map)
August 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion for Summary Judgment; For the reasons set forth in the memorandum, it is a question for the jury whether, in retaliation for plaintiff filing a complaint with the EEOC in early Jan uary of 2007, defendant placed plaintiff on limited duty status in January of 2007 and delayed in returning him to full-duty status until April of 2007, when plaintiff had been cleared by a physician to return to full-duty status as of February 26, 2007. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 8/30/10. (map)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HINTON v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOLANDO HINTON
Represented By: Susan E. Mahood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?