LITTLE v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: WANDA ANN LITTLE
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2008cv01087
Filed: August 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joy Flowers Conti
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION Denying 6 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 8 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as set forth more fully within. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/21/09. (cal )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LITTLE v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WANDA ANN LITTLE
Represented By: Karl E. Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?