ROBINSON v. COUNTYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. et al

Plaintiff: KIMBERLEY A. ROBINSON
Defendant: COUNTYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. and COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Case Number: 2:2008cv01563
Filed: November 10, 2008
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 2, 2011 122 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that, for reasons more fully stated in said Order, 114 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions is denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/2/11. (jg)
November 16, 2010 91 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; that Defendants shall produce Sections 4, 5, and 10 of the cover memorandum to Plaintiff by 11/22/10 at 5:00 p.m.; that Defendants shall produce Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 18, 19, 20, and 24 of the written agreement to Plaintiff by 11/22/10 at 5:00 p.m.; that Defendants shall produce the Acknowledgement page, Schedule 2 to Attorney/Trustee Agreement, and the Westport Insurance Customized Practice Coverag e Declarations, which were all attached to the written agreement, to Plaintiff by 11/22/10 at 5:00 p.m.; that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5)(C), each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred with respect to Plaintiffs motion. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/16/10. (jg)
October 21, 2010 74 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER indicating that upon consideration of Plaintiff's First Motion to Compel Production of Documents 64 , it is hereby ordered that Defendants shall produce the documents confirming the accounts and institutions into which Plaintiff's pa yments were deposited by 10/29/10 at 5:00 PM; it is further ordered that to the extent that Defendants have produced the documents exhibiting the fees and costs associated with the reinstatement figures, Plaintiff's motion to compel those docume nts is moot; and, finally, it is ordered that, if Plaintiff so desires, each Defendant shall produce a witness to provide answers to paragraph 2d of Plaintiff's Notice of Deposition pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6), which shall occur by 11/15/10. Details more fully stated in Order. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/21/10. (tpk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROBINSON v. COUNTYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KIMBERLEY A. ROBINSON
Represented By: Ronald J. Fischer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.
Represented By: Martin C. Bryce, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P.
Represented By: Martin C. Bryce, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?