EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION et al
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION |
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1557 |
2:2010cv01284 |
September 30, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Nora Barry Fischer |
Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 264 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated more fully within, U.S. Steel's Motion for Summary Judgment 227 is granted. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/20/13. (jg) |
Filing 220 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 205 Second Renewed Motion to Dismiss Time-Barred Claims and EEOC's Class Claim re 3 Amended Complaint filed by UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within said Opinion, said Motion is granted, in part, and denied, in part; An appropropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/23/12. (jg) |
Filing 218 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, U.S. Steels Motions for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Docket Nos. 119 ; 146 ) are denied as premature and lacking evidentiary support. However, the Court does not preclude the possibility of awarding attorneys' fees and costs, under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) or 28 U.S.C. § 1927 or the Courts inherent authority, at the conclusion of the case, if the evidence before the Court at that time warrants such an award. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/26/12. (jg) |
Filing 195 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons stated within, EEOC's Motion for Reconsideration is denied, with prejudice. Likewise, EEOC's Motions for Suppression of the Special Master's Reports and Recommendations, Recusal of the S pecial Master, and Sanctions are denied, with prejudice. The Court's adoption of the Special Masters Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 118 ) stands. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 4/5/12. (jg) |
Filing 164 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that Plaintiff DeSimone's Motion 91 and Plaintiff EEOC's Motion 90 are DENIED, with prejudice (details more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/29/2011. (bdk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.