MONTGOMERY v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL LYNN MONTGOMERY
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number: 2:2012cv01356
Filed: September 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Butler
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Schwab
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, and 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by CRYSTAL LYNN MONTGOMERY. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 02/28/2013. (lmt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MONTGOMERY v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL LYNN MONTGOMERY
Represented By: Christine M. Nebel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?