ADAMS MFG. CORP. v. HORIZON GROUP USA, INC

Defendant: HORIZON GROUP USA, INC
Plaintiff: ADAMS MFG. CORP.
Case Number: 2:2013cv00537
Filed: April 15, 2013
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Butler
Presiding Judge: Maureen P. Kelly
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2013 41 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 38 Motion for Attorney Fees for the reasons set forth more fully in the Memorandum Order itself. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/20/2013. (bb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ADAMS MFG. CORP. v. HORIZON GROUP USA, INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HORIZON GROUP USA, INC
Represented By: Wendy West Feinstein
Represented By: Timothy P. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ADAMS MFG. CORP.
Represented By: Lynn J. Alstadt
Represented By: Ralph G. Fischer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.