FORD v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
Plaintiff: LEON D. FORD
Defendant: CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, REGINA MCDONALD, NATE HARPER, DAVID DERBISH, MICHAEL KOSKO and ANDREW MILLER
Case Number: 2:2013cv01364
Filed: September 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Maureen P. Kelly
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 511 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 499 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/12/17. (ard)
December 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 505 ORDER denying 502 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/5/17. (ard)
August 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 287 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 275 Motion to Bifurcate. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 08/04/17. (eca)
August 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 206 OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 180 Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 183 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 08/15/16. (eca)
December 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Defendants Nate Harper and Regina McDonald, in their official capacities, and the City of Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, is GRANTED and the Clerk shall terminate these parties from the docket of this action; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims alleging unreasonable search and seizure, the use of excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and assault and battery, asserted against Defendants Andrew Miller, Michael Kosko and David Derbish ; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion t o Dismiss is DENIED as to Defendants' assertion of qualified immunity as a complete defense to Plaintiff's action; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to the claims asserted against the City of Pittsburgh. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/22/2014. (ndf )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FORD v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEON D. FORD
Represented By: Monte J. Rabner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Represented By: Michael E. Kennedy
Represented By: Daniel D. Regan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE
Represented By: Michael E. Kennedy
Represented By: Daniel D. Regan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: REGINA MCDONALD
Represented By: Michael E. Kennedy
Represented By: Daniel D. Regan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NATE HARPER
Represented By: Michael E. Kennedy
Represented By: Daniel D. Regan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID DERBISH
Represented By: Bryan Campbell
Represented By: Allison N. Lachat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL KOSKO
Represented By: Bryan Campbell
Represented By: Allison N. Lachat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW MILLER
Represented By: Bryan Campbell
Represented By: Allison N. Lachat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?