MINOR et al v. CUMBERLAND TOWNSHIP et al
| STEPHANIE RENEE MINOR, L. M., B. J. and J. M. |
| CUMBERLAND TOWNSHIP, RUSSELL PAUL MILLER, JR. and GARRETT TOOTHMAN |
| 2:2013cv01821 |
| December 27, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 57 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the following Counts are DISMISSED with prejudice: Count II, Count III, Count XII, Count XIV and Count XVI. Count I and Count IV are DISMISSED insofar as they allege that Officer Miller engaged in excessive force against the Minor children and insofar as they allege that Officer Toothman engaged in excessive force. Defendants' Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/27/17. (jwr)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Count XV is hereby DISMISSED, and Defendants' Motion is DENIED in all other respects. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 9/28/15. (jwr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
