MCGINNIS v. HAMMER et al
| VERN E. MCGINNIS, JR. |
| MARK HAMMER, STEPHANIE WOOD, MARK CAPPOZA and HEALTH CARE PROVIDER M.H.M. |
| 2:2015cv00398 |
| March 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
ORDER granting 125 and 132 Motions to Dismiss and adopting Report and Recommendations re 144 Report and Recommendations. The Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of 2 Appellate Pr ocedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this order a notice of appeal, as provided in Federal Rule Appellate Procedure 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Room 3110, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, within thirty (30) days. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/25/2017. (smc)
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION setting forth the reasons plaintiff's motion for objection and appeal for motion to appoint counsel 23 will be GRANTED to the extent plaintiff seeks to preserve his rights to file a renewed motion to appoint counsel at an appropriate time. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/14/15. (kjm) Modified on 12/14/2015 to include "will be GRANTED" and "An appropriate order will be entered." (kjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
