WONDERLING v. SCI FOREST et al
| EDWARD WONDERLING |
| SCI FOREST, OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2016cv01687 |
| November 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Forest |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. For the reasons set out in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, it appearing that Petitioner is presently pursuing his state court remedies, this case is hereby STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Ad ministrative closings comprise a familiar way in which courts remove cases from their active files without final adjudication, and it does not prejudice the rights of the parties in any manner. Petitioner shall file a motion to reopen this case withi n thirty (30) days of exhausting his state court remedies. If Petitioner does not refile his lawsuit within thirty (30) days, the case will be dismissed with prejudice based on the assumption that he no longer wishes to pursue these claims. Respondents' Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 8 ) is hereby dismissed without prejudice to refile once this case is reopened. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/28/2017. (kg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
