CUP et al v. AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION et al
| RONALD A. CUP, MARK GREENAWALT and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL, AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO |
| AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, AKERS NATIONAL ROLL COMPANY and AKERS NATIONAL ROLL COMPANY HEALTH & WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN |
| 2:2017cv00189 |
| February 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Westmoreland |
| Arthur J. Schwab |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING 55 Defendants' Motion to Stay; DENYING AS MOOT 59 Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 08/03/2017. (eet)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM ORDER GRANTING 40 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Arbitration and DENYING AS MOOT 36 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Counts II and III of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice. This case shall be A DMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. However, the Court ORDERS the Parties to complete the Alternative Dispute Resolution process as agreed to in 35 the Parties' Stipulation Selecting ADR Process, prior to the arbitration of this matter. The initial case management conference scheduled for June 14, 2017 is canceled. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 6/13/2017. (eet)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
