HELVETIA COAL COMPANY et al v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL UNION
Plaintiff: HELVETIA COAL COMPANY, LAUREL RUN MINING COMPANY, ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY and CONSOL AMONATE FACILITY, LLC
Defendant: UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL UNION
Case Number: 2:2017cv01417
Filed: October 31, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Cathy Bissoon
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court finds that the first-filed rule dictates that this action be transferred to the Southern District of West Virginia. The Court declines to consider the Union's arguments to dismiss Counts Three and Five. Therefore, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or Transfer Jurisdiction (Doc. 28 ) is GRANTED insofar as the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia for consideration by th at Court as to whether consolidation with United Mine Workers of America v. CONSOL Energy, Inc., 16-CV-12506 (S.D. W.Va.) is appropriate. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply, filed on June 14, 2018 (Doc. 33 ), is DENIED as moot. See contents of this filing. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/26/18. (rdl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HELVETIA COAL COMPANY et al v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL UNION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HELVETIA COAL COMPANY
Represented By: Michael J. Sweeney
Represented By: John R. Woodrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAUREL RUN MINING COMPANY
Represented By: Michael J. Sweeney
Represented By: John R. Woodrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY
Represented By: Michael J. Sweeney
Represented By: John R. Woodrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CONSOL AMONATE FACILITY, LLC
Represented By: Michael J. Sweeney
Represented By: John R. Woodrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL UNION
Represented By: Megan M. Block
Represented By: Michael J. Healey
Represented By: Arthur R. Traynor, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?