THOMPSON v. DUNN

THOMPSON v. DUNN

Plaintiff:	WILLIAM G. THOMPSON
Defendant:	LEO DUNN
Case Number:	2:2018cv00687
Filed:	May 24, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Northumberland
Presiding Judge:	Maureen P. Kelly
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 14, 2018	Filing 11 ORDER indicating that after a Report and Recommendation was filed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on August 22, 2018, (Docket No. 10 ), recommending that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be dismissed, for failure to state a claim upon w hich relief can be granted and Plaintiff was provided 14 days to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been lodged by this date, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly 9;s Report and Recommendation, (Docket No. 10 ), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 8 is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; the Clerk of Court sh all mark this case CLOSED; and pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if Petitioner wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, within thirty (30) days. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/14/2018.(bdk)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 14, 2018

Filing 11 ORDER indicating that after a Report and Recommendation was filed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on August 22, 2018, (Docket No. 10 ), recommending that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be dismissed, for failure to state a claim upon w hich relief can be granted and Plaintiff was provided 14 days to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been lodged by this date, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly 9;s Report and Recommendation, (Docket No. 10 ), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 8 is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; the Clerk of Court sh all mark this case CLOSED; and pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if Petitioner wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed. R. App. P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, at 700 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA, within thirty (30) days. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/14/2018.(bdk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMPSON v. DUNN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM G. THOMPSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: LEO DUNN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?