KAY v. FRONTIER CONSTRUCTION
Plaintiff: GARY L. KAY
Defendant: FRONTIER CONSTRUCTION
Case Number: 2:2018cv01117
Filed: August 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Lisa Pupo Lenihan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING the #7 Motion for Withdrawal of Appearance. Attorney Danielle M. Vugrinovich terminated. Defendant Frontier Construction will continue to berepresented by Craig M. Brooks, Esquire. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/17/2018. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmb)
October 16, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by FRONTIER CONSTRUCTION. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Vugrinovich, Danielle)
October 16, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig M. Brooks on behalf of FRONTIER CONSTRUCTION. (Brooks, Craig)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that because this case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge, each party must execute and file the form consenting to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge or selecting the option to have the case randomly assigned to a District Judge no later than November 1, 2018. The applicable form is available on the Courts website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov in the forms section. THE EVENT USED FOR DOCKETING THIS FORM IS FOUND UNDER OTHER DOCUMENTS, CALLED CONSENT TO TRIAL BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR DISTRICT JUDGE. If the parties elect to have the case assigned to a District Judge, Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan will continue to manage the case as provided for in Local Rule 72G. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form) (jmb)
September 21, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Danielle M. Vugrinovich on behalf of FRONTIER CONSTRUCTION. (Vugrinovich, Danielle)
September 11, 2018 Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by GARY L. KAY. FRONTIER CONSTRUCTION waiver sent on 8/24/2018, answer due 10/23/2018. (Narahari, Prabhu)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 08/24/2018. (jmb)
August 22, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FRONTIER CONSTRUCTION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4836954), filed by GARY L. KAY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (ksa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KAY v. FRONTIER CONSTRUCTION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GARY L. KAY
Represented By: Prabhu Narahari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRONTIER CONSTRUCTION
Represented By: Danielle M. Vugrinovich
Represented By: Craig M. Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?