McCALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| ALBERT McCALL |
| ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, SCOTT W. BRADY, SOO C. SONG, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARVIN MILLER and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY |
| 2:2018cv01325 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Remark: Correspondence letter regarding filing fee received from ALBERT McCALL (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ept) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against SCOTT W. BRADY, MARVIN MILLER, ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, SOO C. SONG, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed by ALBERT McCALL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (ept) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the entire filing fee. Plaintiff shall pay $51.50 as an initial partial filing fee as provided by 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A); however, he is still assessed the total $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward, within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, the initial partial filing fee of $51.50 to the Clerk of Court. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff shall be required to make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income (that is, all funds deposited into the account) credited to the account. Plaintiff is warned that he is ultimately responsible for payment of the filing fee if the agency with custody over him lapses in its duty to make payments on his behalf. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to the Inmate Account Officer at Plaintiff's place of confinement. The Clerk of Court shall enclose an authorization form which Plaintiff shall complete and return within ten (10) days of this Order. If the initial partial filing fee of $51.50 is not received within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order then this action may be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to reopen this case and docket this Complaint and any attached exhibits. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on November 2, 2018. (kcc)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ALBERT McCALL. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Envelope) (ept) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER that the Clerk of Court is to mark this case CLOSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff may submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a certified copy of the inmate account statement for the six (6) months preceding the filing of the complaint. If that motion is granted, the case will be reopened. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff may reopen the case by paying the $400.00 filing fee. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days from this date to appeal this order to a district judge pursuant to Local Rule 72.C.2. Failure to appeal within fourteen (14) days may constitute waiver of the right to appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/30/2018. (jmb)
|
| Filing 1 Remark: Complaint with no filing fee or In Forma Pauperis motion lodged. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Envelope) (ept) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
