GRAY v. GILMORE et al
| HEATH W. GRAY |
| MICHAEL ZAKEN, ROBERT GILMORE and STEPHEN DURCO |
| 2:2018cv01414 |
| October 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER that a Response to the #4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Motion for TRO shall be filed no later than December 27, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 12/19/2018. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmb)
|
| Filing 15 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by HEATH W. GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by STEPHEN DURCO, ROBERT GILMORE, MICHAEL ZAKEN. (Bradley, Scott) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott A. Bradley on behalf of STEPHEN DURCO, ROBERT GILMORE, MICHAEL ZAKEN. (Bradley, Scott) |
| Filing 12 Errata re #10 Notice of Appearance by STEPHEN DURCO, ROBERT GILMORE, MICHAEL ZAKEN. Reason for Correction: Incorrect Service Address on Certificate of Service. (Bradley, Scott) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by STEPHEN DURCO, MICHAEL ZAKEN, ROBERT GILMORE. STEPHEN DURCO waiver sent on 11/5/2018, answer due 1/4/2019; MICHAEL ZAKEN waiver sent on 11/5/2018, answer due 1/4/2019; ROBERT GILMORE waiver sent on 11/5/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. (Bradley, Scott) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott A. Bradley on behalf of STEPHEN DURCO, ROBERT GILMORE, MICHAEL ZAKEN. (Bradley, Scott) |
| Remark: A certified copy of Plaintiffs Authorization (ECF No. #7 ) was mailed to the Inmate Accounts Officer at S.C.I. Greene. (jmb) |
| Filing 9 Partial Payment of Filing Fee by HEATH W. GRAY. Fee $26.75, receipt number 24668053221. (av) |
| Filing 8 Partial Payment of Filing Fee by HEATH W. GRAY. Fee $26.75, receipt number 24668052929. (kly) |
| Filing 7 Authorization permitting withdrawal of prison account funds to pay filing fee by HEATH W. GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
| Filing 6 Remark: Order, Complaint, Notice and Waiver mailed per court order on 10.31.2018 as to Durco, Gilmore and Zaken (jv) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ENTERED that the United States Marshal is directed to mail a copy of the Complaint (ECF. No. #3 ), Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. #4 ), notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons, and waiver, and this order to defendants Robert Gilmore, Michael Zaken and Stephen Durco, as directed by plaintiff. Cost of service shall be advanced by the United States. The defendants are requested to waive service pursuant to Rule4(d). AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days from this date to appeal this order to a district judge pursuant to Local Rule 72.C.2. Failure to appeal within fourteen (14) days may constitute waiver of the right to appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/30/2018. (jmb)
|
| Remark: Service documents were forwarded to the U.S. Marshals. (jmb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by HEATH W. GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against STEPHEN DURCO, ROBERT GILMORE, MICHAEL ZAKEN, filed by HEATH W. GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Part 2, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Envelope) (jv) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the entire filing fee. Plaintiff shall pay $26.75 as an initial partial filing fee as provided by 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1)(A); however, he is still assessed the total $350.00 filing fee. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward, within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order, the initial partial filing fee of $26.75 to the Clerk of Court. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff shall be required to make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income (that is, all funds deposited into the account) credited to the account. Plaintiff is warned that he is ultimately responsible for payment of the filing fee if the agency with custody over him lapses in its duty to make payments on his behalf. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to the Inmate Account Officer at Plaintiff's place of confinement. The Clerk of Court shall enclose an authorization form which Plaintiff shall complete and return within ten (10) days of this Order. If the initial partial filing fee of $26.75 is not received within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order then this action may be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket Plaintiff's Complaint and any attached exhibits. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on October 24, 2018. (kcc)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by HEATH W. GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Monthly Account Statement, #2 Authorization to be completed by prisoner who seeks leave to proceed in forma paupris, #3 Complaint, #4 Complaint for Injunctive relief and damages, #5 Petition for TRO and for Prleiminary Injunction, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Envelope) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
